President Obama has experienced significant nationwide criticism--reflected by a 9% drop in his national approval rating--mainly pertaining to the recent steps taken in implementing his administration's healthcare plan, the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. But is America's discontent with our Commander-in-Chief misplaced? I certainly think so. According to Fox News' article, "How Low Can It Go? ObamaCare Poll Numbers Drop -- Again," much of the public's main misgiving about Obamacare is its recent website malfunctions. I find that there are many other components of the Act that the American people could take issue with than its initial aesthetic problems.
It seems that yet again America's citizens are misinformed by the mass media. Outlets of all political preferences have been reporting on HealthCare.gov's malfunction, but what of Obamacare's effects on doctor's pay, taxation, and overall function within the government? Since mainstream media became widespread and readily available to virtually everyone, it appears that it has essentially determined the public's political opinions by only providing the most basic elements of issues. This is clearly a problem, but I personally see no legitimate alternative to remedy this epidemic of ignorance.
News, Fox. "How Low Can It Go? ObamaCare Poll Numbers Drop -- Again." Fox News. FOX News Network, 20 Nov. 2013. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Twitter Mania
Twitter has undeniably become the new king of social media. It allows people to share what they're doing and how they're feeling with the world in real time, and, unlike other outlets, to interact with celebrities on a personal level and be inundated with information from news sources. Twitter is fun, easy, and unique and, as a result, has experienced long-standing and exponentially increasing success.
The executives over at Twitter decided that they could best exploit Twitter's dominance by going public, and, a little over a week ago, did just that. In it's initial days, Twitter's stock values have soared, but many speculate as to whether this boom will continue--perhaps with good reason. After examining that Facebook bubble, some financial experts believe that Twitter will follow suit in Mark Zuckerberg's fall. Social media sites are only worth how many users it has, and declines of ostensible empires like Facebook occur when competitors push them out.
It is undeniable that social media sites' value entirely depends on their popularity, and Facebook's stock plummeted as it gradually became less desirable to the public, but what many do not consider is that Twitter has already battled the storms brought on by rival outlets--including Facebook. For example, when Facebook bought out Instagram, Twitter responded by developing Vine, which, too, continues to become favorable to its users. It appears that Twitter is more robust than many give it credit for, and I, personally, do not see why Twitter's stock will not maintain or even grow.
The executives over at Twitter decided that they could best exploit Twitter's dominance by going public, and, a little over a week ago, did just that. In it's initial days, Twitter's stock values have soared, but many speculate as to whether this boom will continue--perhaps with good reason. After examining that Facebook bubble, some financial experts believe that Twitter will follow suit in Mark Zuckerberg's fall. Social media sites are only worth how many users it has, and declines of ostensible empires like Facebook occur when competitors push them out.
It is undeniable that social media sites' value entirely depends on their popularity, and Facebook's stock plummeted as it gradually became less desirable to the public, but what many do not consider is that Twitter has already battled the storms brought on by rival outlets--including Facebook. For example, when Facebook bought out Instagram, Twitter responded by developing Vine, which, too, continues to become favorable to its users. It appears that Twitter is more robust than many give it credit for, and I, personally, do not see why Twitter's stock will not maintain or even grow.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Dukes of Hazard
The stupidity of humanity never
ceases to amaze me. This news report is certainly more benign that the ones we
typically discuss, but man’s irrational behavior still led to someone getting
hurt and another getting put in jail. I personally don’t know what to make of
the situation. Obviously guns were in the hands of untrustworthy men, but was
there some ulterior motive or are these guys just idiots? Whether these men got
the idea to search for Bigfoot from Animal Planet or beef jerky commercials is
irrelevant, the real question is why do humans persistently search for myths
and legends when they have been almost conclusively proven to be nonexistent?
There is much speculation as to why
we try to discover mythical creatures like the Loch Ness Monster, the
Abominable Snowman, and, most recently, Bigfoot. Some claim that it has to do
with our insatiable curiosity for the unknown, while others uphold that we are
motivated by a pursuit of fame and notoriety. I, however, contend that we,
personally, want these storybook
characters to exist. We deeply desire to realize the fantastical tales we imagined
as children and to wholeheartedly believe that there is more to life than what
meets the eye. It is impossible to speak for the men involved in this recent
debacle, but I think that our inner child—along with elements of escapism and
thrill-of-the-hunt—that motivates us to embark on these senseless and fruitless
quests.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)