The recent shootings at the Navy
shipyard in Washington is unfathomable. What would bring a man to murder
innocent people—individuals whose professions are to maintain the liberty of
Americans upon the call of duty, at that—is beyond logical understanding. While
people around the world attempt to explain the origin of this tragedy and how
this madman was allowed to do what he did, I believe it is important to “consult”
Adam Smith and Karl Marx on their takes on the situation.
Adam Smith, in both his discourse
on morality and economics, made it clear that he believes in personal
responsibility. He found that one should fail or succeed on their own merit and
should be held responsible for their actions. I believe he would condemn this
man for what he did and merely place all blame on him for what he did to
innocent Americans. Marx, on the other hand, is a proponent of community and
would most likely argue that we are to blame for this catastrophe. He would
probably say that the burdens society put on him provoked this and that we
should have made more preventative provisions, which would have, in theory,
kept this maniac from access weapons and the shipyard itself.
Whether the man who committed this heinous
act was truly insane or not is irrelevant. Something like this, at a military
base no less, should never happen. I, personally, see this incident from the
points of view of both Smith and Marx and agree with components of each. While
I, like Smith, believe in personal responsibility and that this man should be
held accountable for his actions, I also find that Marx’s sentiments on communal
preparedness hold water, as well: the government should have tighter gun
regulations (more specifically, more thorough background checks) that would not
allow such a madman to have access to powerful weaponry. In the end, though,
whose fault it is or what could have been done to prevent this blasphemy is
important. We can only hope that measures be taken to stop incidents like this
to occur in the future and that the families involved will be consoled.
Why do you think that Marx would have such a negative view of personal responsibility, and Smith such a positive view? Are you basing this on specific quotes? Which ones? In many ways Marx wanted to blame certain individuals for their actions, and Smith wanted to understand the social role in various individual behaviors, so be careful with such generalizations.
ReplyDeleteDo you think that Marx and Smith would have very different views on an issue as removed from the ethical aspects of economics like this? What would those views be? How could we reconstruct what such views might be?